Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waverider who wrote (75751)	7/7/2000 7:14:54 PM
From: A.L. Reagan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Rick, my timing sucked in terms of the "what could have beens." Net sale was in the very low 70's during the very initial free-fall into that range. So, absolutely not one of those Greg M types with self-promoting rah-rah. I did make a number of posts on the "500" thread, as well as here. So, you can look these up, starting around April 1 and onward. You might recall the "green cheese" and "musketeer" debates with Maurice on the "500" and Nokia threads, as well as a number of cautionary posts over here. Have always been bullish on Qualcomm - just a lot less wild-eyed than those who bought the Walter Piechuck price target hook, line, and sinker. And I have learned something, at great expense, in the past few months - that it's OK to fall in love with a company, but not OK to fall in love with its stock. Lastly, I apologize for posting any personal portfolio changes and agree with you that stuff belongs in the realm of PM's. It is, in fact, irritating and uninformative on an ex post facto basis, and I accept the rebuke.