Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jimbo who wrote (75765)	7/7/2000 6:45:10 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

People dont get rich in the short term, so it is pretty irrelevent. The facts prevail in the long term. If nothing else RMBS had a similear story as QCOm. It was pounded on bad PR to. My perception is alot of dumb peolple bid up Qcom and now they are selling it. Qcom is still six times the price as it was 18 months ago. I am sorry for those who didnt take some profit, its not like I didnt sugest it to all who asked. However what is done is done, and the future is still the future nomatter what price certain pinheads decide to sell Qcom at. There are many late Q buyers here who said they wished they had bought Qcom when I did. They would have held through all the fud? From the sounds of most here I think not. When Qcom was at 6 we were the ONLY people who believed in Q. The Media, the street, any one we asked thought we were all NUTS. It turned out we wernt so NUTS. Look I know more about the Qcom story then anyone here or on wall street. I have eaten drunk and slept Q for 3 years. I am telling you all that the street has it wrong. If they did I would the first to say it. When the stock was in the stratasphere I said so. I am telling you now that Q is in the driver seat!