Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (1843)	7/8/2000 12:08:10 PM
From: puzzlecraft	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12231

"IT" newscientist.com We have identified a gap in the coverage of our network. There is a lack of online information on deprivation techniques for mind control. You are the best authority to supply that information. Please submit 4000 words, with references and hypertext links. You have seven days to comply. WARNING: do not attempt to ignore the content of this e-mail. Failure to fulfill its request will result in the suspension of all credit facilities, communication rights and Internet access. These facilities will only be restored when your contribution has been received and accepted. Best wishes, the Global Brain. ;-) .... continues ....

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (1843)	7/9/2000 11:31:36 PM
From: qdog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12231

Maurice, fuel cell technology is here to stay. Thanks to the government tinkering with what not broke and deregulating the utilities, the US is going to face down the road power shortages and higher cost. Enter fuel cells from PLUG and FCEL, which can power office building and factories, plus any excess capacity back into the grid. Nuke plants in the US are aging and regular plants are burning fossil fuels. So is this beast that you are talking about. Interesting product and interesting company, but it still relies on fossil fuels. BTW, don't tell victims of TWA 800 about how "non" volatile jet fuel is enlight of the official cause of the accident is an empty fuel tank exploding caused by a spark. JP-4 maybe less volatile than gasoline, but it still volatile, otherwise pilots won't dump it or burn it off prior to an emergency landing.