SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buffettology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Clarke who wrote (2591)7/8/2000 12:18:05 PM
From: Michael Burry1 Recommendation  Respond to of 4691
 
Re: Gap, we all know Buffett liked it enough to buy some. It definitely has been in a sweet spot, extended temporally by its addition of economic tiers. But what I wonder is why everyone says it's 4-tiered structure appeals to all ages. I definitely see it appealing to nearly all income levels. But not all ages. My wife is a Banana freak, and she will often visit Gap because they are usually in proximity. And of all the hundreds of times I've been in these stores (trying desperately to think of something interesting to avoid developing a frown), I definitely do not notice a geriatric population.

And in the case of Gap, the clothes are nearly as unappealing as those of Abercrombie. I don't think it is a crazy stretch to say Abercrombie could be the next Gap, because I think Gap is as much a beneficiary of a trend as Abercrombie - and it is primarily the kids-to-young adults crowd. But I also would double or triple discount my DCFs if somehow it had become stuck in my mind that something was "the next" big thing. One of the oldest rules in the investor's handbook - there is NEVER a "next" big thing.

Gap is like any retail organization. The gravy train has passed, and it will not give and give to investors for decades to come. What growth has not yet been realized has been fully discounted.

So that's where ANF's advantage lies. If it can become half the next Gap and grow 4 times in size, we've got a winner.

Mike