Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bobby beara who wrote (25051)	7/8/2000 10:17:06 AM
From: dennis michael patterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

b, you DO speaketh with restrained tongue, and with good reason. I share the view that this rally may not have legs. Sy Harding-- a perma bear for sure (I have his book right here) -- is wrong to focus on companies like CA, which is a bs operation run by thieves (you recall, I am sure, that stock option nonsense). NOK is a MUCH better indicator that something is wrong. I think we get ups and down still. I sold most of my stuff yesterday per the Sew signal and Carpino.

To: bobby beara who wrote (25051)	7/8/2000 10:42:58 AM
From: donald sew	Respond to of 42787

Bobby, Im getting CLASS 2 SELL signals on my short-term stuff and CLASS 1 and CLASS 2 SELL signal on my WEEKLY(mid-term) charts. Is there going to be a huge selloff, I dont know, but I have noticed that the recent economic reports have not yet been able to push the overall market up significantly and for an extended period of time, at least not yet. Since I have the overall market in the CLASS SELL region for both the short and mid-term, Im not expecting much more upside, before some sort of top arrives or that this tight trading range just continues. So if positive economic news recently was not able to break the tight trading range to the upside, at least not just yet, what happens if a bad reports pops up. Does the market then continue the tight trading range or break to the downside? My short-term technicals are still showing that anomoly as I mentioned previously. Im not strongly bearish, but I am suspecting that this tight trading range may be a stairstep to the downside and we saw back in 1998. Not totally sure, but just a suspicion.

To: bobby beara who wrote (25051)	7/8/2000 11:08:58 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

BB, Jay Harding is focusing on the wrong indicators. Debt is one main factor for the slowdown. I bet you many are at their limit on their credit cards. Real earnings after taxes did not keep track with prices ...... or otherwise also called inflation. The jump in oil prices which all of us see it daily brought some memories back and some restrain. Aside, for example the car life cycle is not 5 years but closer to 10 and US population does not grow 10% a year. Same will apply to housing and it's appliances. The DOT.COM's are letting people go and not hiring like mad. The FED action on interest rates is affecting the economy at the fringes and only keeps the dollar strong. Way off the popular perception that recent interest hikes are cooling the economy. A slowing economy has more to do with credit limits and debt burden than interest rates. Cost of credit to you and me or other small business barrely changed since 1997. On my Chicken page over a year ago I stated that only a slowing in consumption growth will induce a weaker labor market which will slow the stock market and then the economy. IMHO the FED is in a box due to their mistakes in 1998 were they saved Clinton Presidency by lowering interest rates and as a result damaged the world economy long term. The FED stepped out of their responsibility and manipulated the outcome of US politics and therefore they violated the USC Title 18, ......... part I, Chater 11 or for example Chapter 115 will fit in reverse. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. ........ and I bet ya DMP will disagree <GGGGGG> BWDIK Haim