Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (46731)	7/8/2000 3:53:40 PM
From: john dodson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Dan3, >But if Rambus can win that lawsuit, it'll be worth at least what it's selling for now. Just curious, but if that happens, will you go long RMBS? Or just disappear. <seriously> -John

To: Dan3 who wrote (46731)	7/8/2000 4:32:36 PM
From: Steve Lee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

OK, I have settled now. But you still didn't answer my question, preferring instead to give me investment advice (please remember I was holding calls with RMBS in 2 figs pre split and bought calls and stock all the way up in March, selling above 400 and buying back in just in time for the recent licensing news so your advice is really not necessary). The question was, how is DDR RAM going to prosper in the server market if the best evidence for the existence of DDR chipsets is a photograph of a mainboard that will only support up to 1GB of RAM? I have already conceded in a recent "conversation" with Scumbria that RDRAM is not a particularly good choice for servers due to its capacity limitations per channel, but I didn't expect the capacity of a vapourware DDR chipset (as per your photographic "evidence" to be half that of RDRAM boards that have been on the market for the best part of a year (840). The outlook for RMBS gets better with every post you make! Keep em coming !