SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (27493)7/8/2000 12:23:32 PM
From: gdichaz  Respond to of 54805
 
LindyBill: You are of course right, the LA Times is verrry influential. I would therefore suggest that the lead paragraphs should conform to the real world.

The Bloomberg and Dow Jones stories did not reflect Korean stories, nor Korean "announcements". They were made up for US consumption out of whole cloth. They were cut and paste. The LA Times's excuse for such inaccuracy is to hide behind the financial press services.

Sad.

But as you say, influential.

Since this is what happens in mainstream press, thanks for SI.

Best.

Cha2

PS Note there are no stories in Korea itself similar to those in Bloomberg or Dow Jones yet - a day later.

No decision has been made at all by the companies nor the government.

At least none have been announced in Korea.



To: LindyBill who wrote (27493)7/8/2000 1:27:20 PM
From: Dr. Id  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Mike, here is a good example of the FUD that I believe will continue to depress the stock price. Todays LA Times lead article in
the business section. They are verrrrrry influential.


Lindy,
It's interesting...I read the LA Times article this morning, and had the opposite reaction. I actually thought that aside from the headline, it was a pretty even article (I didn't see it as FUD). Particurlarly the following paragraphs were VERY positive and suggest a market over reaction:

Although South Korea is Qualcomm's biggest market, analysts said
investors overreacted to the news because the rival systems are based on
Qualcomm's code division multiple access, or CDMA, technology and will
result in substantial royalties for the firm.
"For any variety of CDMA that's chosen, Qualcomm will benefit," said
Mark Lowenstein, global wireless analyst for the Yankee Group in Boston.
"The future of CDMA technology in general is looking even stronger."


Dr.Id@holdingandpraying.com



To: LindyBill who wrote (27493)7/8/2000 1:34:43 PM
From: Uncle Frank  Respond to of 54805
 
LA Times: Once Highflying Qualcomm Stock Declines Again on Latest Bad News

Weren't there headlines announcing Dewey Wins?

uf