Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Return to Sender who wrote (75910)	7/8/2000 7:27:35 PM
From: waverider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

>>>Benjamin, moderated threads exist because we as individuals often are incapable of partaking in a rational, unemotional, discourse of ideas while discussing investments or in this case for me potential investment.<<< LOL!!!! Man, oh man...if you ever knew the history of this one. Stick around a few months. You'll get the idea. At least the swell heads here can take the heat and don't hide behind censor's skirt. Rick

To: Return to Sender who wrote (75910)	7/9/2000 9:26:12 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Return to sender. The fact that Revenues has declined 1% is meaningless because it compares Qcom without its two bigest revenue producing units. If you consider the fact that Revenues were flat with that consideration it exemplifies HUGE revenue growth in chipset, and IPR sales. The Korean PR is nothing more then posturing. The Koreans will use the technology most compatible with their existing IS95 network. That system will utilize The Cdma2000 chiprate and sychronization. If they want to call it WCDMA its fine with me. The fact is even if they didnt Qcom gets equall royalties anyway.