Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (105370)	7/8/2000 5:13:57 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, >Despite the mislabeling, we agree that the author's fundamental premise is correct? 820/PC800 DRDRAM is slower than 815/PC133. Looks like. Hey, if Rambus disappeared and never was, would they be missed? Tony

To: Scumbria who wrote (105370)	7/8/2000 8:17:06 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Despite the mislabeling, we agree that the author's fundamental premise is correct? 820/PC800 DRDRAM is slower than 815/PC133" I agree and with the boost from the i815 chipset it looks as though the CuMine might very well pull even with TTurd in benchmarks, if head to head comparisons were available. Unfortunately AMD only posts phoney scores based on unavailable MBs, unavailable DirectX, and unavailable graphics drivers. Amazing how all the hype about Athlons being a generation ahead of Intel resulted in Athlons trailing CuMines in most all benchmarks and now claims of TTurd being an advanced version of the "superior" design result in essentially equal performance. But then again, maybe it's not all that surprising after all.... EP