Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Voltaire who wrote (24711)	7/8/2000 9:54:24 PM
From: abuelita	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Hi Mr. V. I guess you could tell that I was riled up a bit, eh? And I was trying so hard to make a good impression. I'ts okay. I'm over it now. So, what else should we talk about. I promise, whatever it is, I'll be cool I'll just pull up a chair here and wait for someone to bring me a nice cool one and we can just sit and chat. Love, Rosie P.S. I just sent Polvie a really nice picture of you and Dealer and me. I'm so glad I have it.

To: Voltaire who wrote (24711)	7/8/2000 10:06:45 PM
From: CAtechTrader	Respond to of 35685

More QCOM FUD...it never ends...the sanctimonious financial talk show host, Bob Brinker...who says I told you so about all these over valued stocks...today said in a discussion re: QCOM that W-CDMA was developed by NOK and ERICY with no input from QCOM and that W-CDMA is a direct competitor with QCOM's CDMA2000..is it so difficult for the financial press to understand a story that is "gray" rather than "black and white"? I mean W-CDMA is built on the back of QCOM's IP and QCOM is not cut out by any means if W-CDMA is chosen. As Dr. J says...the flavor of CDMA doesn't matter....what will it take for any balanced or at least sophisticated reporting of the true facts? Time for Dr. J. to hire a PR firm me thinks. We are in a full-ought "FUD fight"!