Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (2724)	7/9/2000 7:34:43 AM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

Losses can make you say the weirdest chit: Our government should take positive action to assure that a superior home-grown technology finds a market worldwide amongst our trading partners Message 14011095 The other suggestions in the post are equally well thought out -g-. --Allan

To: AllansAlias who wrote (2724)	7/9/2000 9:50:47 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Allan thank you for previewing my post. However I am not scared of Qcom droping from 130-55 because I sold my entire position(at 138) and am net short the market. I have been since febuary. Though I still think Qcom is a fine investement, and plan on buying a litlle at these prices the point I was making was that the people buying Qcom need to have a long term view. Why you fealt like taking my post out of context is beyond me, and your behavior dignifies your lack of comprehension. Frankly with Qcom selling at 40 Times 2001 earnings, its hardly the poster boy for overvalued stocks anymore. Maybee you thought you were on the BRCM thread?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (2724)	7/9/2000 12:16:26 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

Allan, Re Qualcomm Interesting. I got a charge out of the post you pointed to. The person was talking about honest management. I know one of the fellows that heads up Qualcomm as he is a Minneapolis "boy". They should look into his history and notice what he has done in the past with his game. I have looked at Qualcomm and I can not come up with a fair value for the company. Have you? But it is my opinion that in the future we will need non royalty standards to have the most efficient pricing for the technology. How long in the future I do not know. Joan