Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Labrador who wrote (76043)	7/9/2000 9:36:15 PM
From: techguerrilla	Respond to of 152472

Progress not perfection The merits and costs of CDMA as opposed to wCDMA are now getting discussed. Qualcomm is not being seen in tomorrow's WSJ article as a whopping LOSER. I seriously believe Ericsson's capitulation on royalties to Qualcomm for wCDMA will get some serious focus by Tuesday or Wednesday. That will put Nokia into a public perception corner. This could be focal week for Qualcomm. BWTFDIK? ¡john!

To: Labrador who wrote (76043)	7/9/2000 10:26:18 PM
From: Rick	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

"Ericsson, NTT DoCoMo and Nokia have agreed on the percentage to be charged for the different essential technologies, and when added up, those percentages should not be more than the agreed-upon cap," said Janos Fugedi, president of Ericsson Korea, last month. Nokia and Ericsson are reported to have told the ministry that five percent or less would be charged as royalty fees." If the "cap" is less than 5% and Q royalty in 4 - 5% what exactly are Nokia and Ericsson promising? - Fred