SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tinkershaw who wrote (27580)7/10/2000 7:15:49 AM
From: gdichaz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
tinkershaw: One of the interesting aspects of Geof Moore's new book "...Fault Line" is a diagram on p.94 which shows the "Competitive-Advantage Hierarchy." The base is "Technology Wave".

His description starts with:

"In high tech, competitive advantage begins with the categorical advantage of a new technology over an older one. ...."

This is in his chapter on "Shareholder Value".

Your fine post on AMCC reminded me of that. (AMCC is in a basket in my case which includes BRCM, TXN, PMCS (recent purchase)and then a bit different - CREE and ARMHY.)(And then the related aspect of the gorilla QCOM)

BTW agree strongly with your general approach as it has worked for me over the years.

But am curious the extent to which you dig into the technologies themselves prior to or simultaneously to looking for a buy and hold candidate.

It would seem common sense that a technology investor - especially a high tech investor - try to learn as much as practical himself/herself about the key technology underlying that company's future as simple prudence and risk minimization.

Moore seems to suggest a similar view in his new book.

Commend it to you.

Best.

Cha2



To: tinkershaw who wrote (27580)7/10/2000 9:44:16 AM
From: Uncle Frank  Respond to of 54805
 
That's a good summary of amcc, Tinker; well researched and well said.

uf



To: tinkershaw who wrote (27580)7/10/2000 11:19:48 AM
From: Jacob Snyder  Respond to of 54805
 
thanks for a well-written description of AMCC. eom.



To: tinkershaw who wrote (27580)7/11/2000 10:17:44 AM
From: Don Miller  Respond to of 54805
 
Tinkershaw,
I feel your review of AMCC was one of the very best discussions I have read in this half year. I must admit I hold more AMCC than one should normally, for the very reason that you described so well.

Looks like I need to visit this BB more often.

Thank you for your thoughts and the time it took to share them with us.

Don Miller