Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave B who wrote (46877)	7/10/2000 3:46:03 PM
From: KeepItSimple	Respond to of 93625

>They did not receive any warrants as part of the settlement. I never said they did. I said they were given large chunks of Rambus warrants recently, and that the companies who had gotten those warrants suddenly decided to "settle", the day after the 4:1 split. I did not say the warrants were a term of the settlement, although I DID say the reason they decided to settle was because they owned the warrants. The profits they made from those warrants tripling in value were more than the entire proposed value of the Rambus royalties to be paid. A guy named Earlie posted a link to a south korean newspaper that had all this stuff in detail.