Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cacaito who wrote (14036)	7/10/2000 9:29:17 PM
From: Bluegreen	Respond to of 17367

WRONG AGAIN!!!!!!!!!! CTXS DID NOT ROB MSFT's PATENTS!!!!! LLY BTW acknowledges Xoma's patents in their filing. Don't you even bother doing ANY research before upchucking your many posts????? I know how upsetting all of this is to you to see LLY showing such interest in BPI but really enough is enough.

To: Cacaito who wrote (14036)	7/10/2000 10:40:31 PM
From: Robert K.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17367

Cacaito, i seem to remember you rechanting stuff like >bpi is proven NOT to work >or dont trust baxter dont trust xoma >or I trust lilly, everyone can believe lilly >or now will you say "i dont trust lilly" because bpi has been proven not to work. >it sure sounds to me that lilly has taken a lot more than a casual interest in bpi. Lilly saw the bpi data, you did not. Lilly has seemingly tested bpi themselves and felt the need to "try" to patent it with your precious protein c. >why bother, after all bpi doesnt work....... Seems to me your proclaimations have been just a bit overdone. Your havent seen bpi data, yet you know it wont work. Pleeeze. Oh.... but protein c works just fine. Lets be honest..... whould you use protein c or would you choose to add bpi?.......