SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lee who wrote (47029)7/11/2000 3:42:13 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Steve,

Those buying Rambus based systems are the people who want to buy the fastest systems, the same sort of people who buy the new processor speed grades when they come out. Those people are not involved in the typical upgrade cycle of 2 to 3 years.

You make a valid point about paying the extra for little or no performance increase. I ask myself the same question everytime processor speed goes up by 33MHZ. I mean who would buy a 1Gig PC when a 800MHz is much cheaper and they probably won't notice the performance difference.


I had this discussion with Tench a while ago. There are enthusiasts that want the best (fastest) system at a given price. Let's say the best $2,000 system, $3,000 etc. Once you establish the budget, you have to come up with components using the price performance ratio of the components.

Since RDRAM vs. SDRAM has the worst price performance ratio of any other component, anybody thinking rationally will undertake that upgrade as the last thing. Even upgrade from the second fastest processor to the fastest processor has a better price/performance than RDRAM vs. SDRAM, you would not be acting rationally if you bought RDRAM in any system with less than 1 GHz CPU.

Joe



To: Steve Lee who wrote (47029)7/11/2000 4:35:14 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Steve,

The important point is that anybody who has bought a Rambus based system has already decided to pay thru the nose and wants a high performing system.

If so, they might prefer to actually get a system which is higher performance, rather than lower performance. Of course, you could always mask a low performance memory behind a fast disk and graphics card.

Scumbria