Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (105471)	7/11/2000 5:59:48 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Jim, >Intels marketing and PR is nothing short of stellar vs AMDs which is virtually non-existant. Come on! AMD's PR is Jerry. Every time I see that guy on CNBC or Bloomberg, he's going to single-handedly destroy the evil empire Intel with his by far superior chips. Maybe the whole rest of the company lives in fear to say anything because it might go against the grain of the mouth that roared. Tony

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (105471)	7/11/2000 7:32:57 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: ". The Celeron IIs are a good vehicle for low speed Coppermines that otherwise would find the dumpster. Not so good having to take good 600-700 Mhz coppermines and laser zap the cache..." Jim do facts ever play a part in your posts or do you just make things up for the heck of it? What makes you think any of the above is true? Do you have one shread of evidence that Intel has ever scrapped parts because of speed or that Intel has ever downbinned a CuMine to a Celeron because of speed or ever laser-zapped any products? You seemed to be confident enough to post it. How about showing us where you got this nonsense. Shall we start calling you Jim "theregister" McMannis? EP Link please.