Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (82257)	7/12/2000 3:00:47 PM
From: Dushyant Narayen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Michael, are you still playing the tech sector at all ? Haven't seen any put summaries or raving/ranting about old faves like MU, more's the pity <g> Do you think it is upwards and away from here for techs, after the YHOO numbers and reduced interest jitters for at least another month ? Regards, DN

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (82257)	7/12/2000 3:47:25 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Michael, briefing.com had a blurb on VIGN this morning. Said the sell-off was due to fears that their architecture could not communicate with java or msft-based application servers, but that Salomon Smith was defending the stock after speaking with the company's development team ... Interestingly, they (briefing) had a 'Trader's Edge' piece on VERT today as well ... I wonder if somebody there reads this thread? <g>