SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (83729)7/13/2000 12:14:57 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
As far as I know no theologian has suggested any experiments that would
demonstrate the probable existence of God.


Experiments, no. But Aquinas among many others posited proofs of the existence of God. Very logical proofs, whether or not you agree with him.

Might as well have experiments that prove love.

An interesting statement. Would you say that if you can't devise a scientific experiment that proves that love exists, therefore it doesn't exist? (Or maybe it does or doesn't, but you can't prove it, so you can't know?) Personally, I know love exists because I experience it. And I know God exists because I have experienced him/her/it. A different kind of proof/knowledge from scientific proof/knowledge. But, IMO, no less legitimate.

Theological proofs don't exist.

Now that's plain silly. Sure they do. Go back to Aquinas. Just like mathematics, you have postulates that you can't prove but accept, from which you develop proofs of various propositions through the application of logical rules. As with mathematics, you have to start somewhere, with some first principles you can't prove but have to accept. As there are different proofs based on which definitions and postulates you start by accepting as true (cf. Euclidian vs. Riemann geometry), so there are different religions that start by accepting different basic principles as true and build proofs on them.