SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NightOwl who wrote (120274)7/13/2000 11:13:03 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583404
 
NightOwl,

I am under the impression that the Willy bus is 100 FSB with 4 data transfers each cycle (somebody correct me if I am wrong).

I am under the impression that Foster has the same bus.

Joe



To: NightOwl who wrote (120274)7/13/2000 11:35:02 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583404
 
NightOwl - RE: "Can anyone here tell me whether or not there are technical design reason's for INTC to design a 400MHz FSB into the P4?"

I'll give my shot at the Intel's technical reason:

Willy's 400MHz fsb > Mustang's 266MHz fsb

;)

AMD at one time hyped Athlons's fsb, so I wonder what they will say when Willy comes out. I think some techweb.com article said Intel may use a 200MHz fsb for the Willy that will hit the mainstream, probably McWilly (TM Kapkan). But it has only been said once so it may not happen.



To: NightOwl who wrote (120274)7/14/2000 1:06:59 AM
From: Petz  Respond to of 1583404
 
NightOwl, INTC probably chose 400 MHz FSB (100 MHz quad-pumped) because that exactly matches the theoritical maximum data transfer rate of a pair of 800 MHz RDRAM channels. (each channel does 1.6 GB/sec, total 3.2 GB/sec, 400 MHz FSB * 8 byte width is also 3.2 GB/sec)

Petz