SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David E. Taylor who wrote (43856)7/14/2000 9:21:06 AM
From: canguyen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
Heard on CNBC 1.484 is the PALM/COMS ratio.



To: David E. Taylor who wrote (43856)7/14/2000 10:02:36 AM
From: kcmike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
Great Explanation David.

Thanks again!

Mike



To: David E. Taylor who wrote (43856)7/15/2000 2:40:26 AM
From: Mang Cheng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
David, your post #43856 made it to today's Cool post section.

Mang



To: David E. Taylor who wrote (43856)7/15/2000 9:02:29 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 45548
 
I recently discovered that the rules for calculating dilution are different when you have a loss compared to when you have a profit. Dilution doesn't reduce EPS loss.

Also, since COMS will have negative EPS for the next 3 Q's, a higher share count will actually reduce the EPS loss, so it could even be seen as beneficial!



To: David E. Taylor who wrote (43856)7/15/2000 10:52:29 AM
From: kcmike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
David,

As a follow-up to the employee options discussion, is it publicly available, or do you know, what the average exercise price is for the employee options?

If it is not extremely low, like $1 - $5 / share, I don't see it having that big of an effect. If many of the employee options are recent, couldn't they very well be underwater?

Thanks,
kcmike