SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: .Trev who wrote (26221)7/15/2000 12:45:55 PM
From: ddl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
From the 2/18/00 prospectus...
"The Marr report contains a review...prepared by MRDI, which presented a Mine Scoping Study....
Three mining scenarios have been studied. Each starts with mining of kimberlite from an open pit....over 2 years, followed by underground mining at production rates of 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 tonnes per day. Each assumes production over a ten year period.""
5 Months later, there is absolutely no problems with a 6,ooo ton per day operation! AND we're only told this since DaBeers showed up.
You can read between the lines all you want, but when this kind of shit is continuously and categorically being stated by the company, then you have to assume that's the direction they are heading for.
Common Dot, everyone knows WSP managaement played down the potential of this mine for the last few years.



To: .Trev who wrote (26221)7/15/2000 3:44:55 PM
From: maintenance  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Right on .Trev. It was more than hints. Even the tonnage. All you had to do was a little arithmetic to see we have had over 40 million tons. We knew this.

Cheers