Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Kulicke and Soffa -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EightyEight who wrote (3878)	7/15/2000 3:56:06 PM
From: Red Dragon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5482

Here is what I said about insider selling at KLIC, as opposed to insider selling at other companies: In summary, I agree that insider selling is usually not as predictive as insider buying. I agreed with that in my previous postings as well. The one exception is when many insiders sell off most of their shares. In this case, it often is very significant. Message 13784360 I guess I have to say it once more. Every company has insider selling. Most of the time it means nothing. That's why I wasn't worried at all about the SDLI insider selling that you referred to. I detailed in the post you referred to that the amount of selling at SDLI was small and methodical (about the same amount quarter after quarter) This is in complete contrast to the "abandon ship" selling that seemed to occur at KLIC (and every other semi company) earlier this year. See middle of this post. Message 13743992 I have been very consistent all along. Small insider selling okay. Big insider selling bad. Should I clarify this further? Maybe this insider selling at KLIC means absolutely nothing. I don't know. I'm just commenting on the actions.