Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (120344)	7/15/2000 11:43:25 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571884

Re: "I don't know any of either[Athlon optimized code or CuMine optimed code]. Maybe JC could help us out" Come on Cirruslvr. You are the one who posted the Athlon SPECFP2000 scores using the Compaq compiler and you've seen the CuMine scores using the Intel Compiler. Cut the nonsense.

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (120344)	7/17/2000 4:15:19 PM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 1571884

"Show me where Athlon optimized code runs faster on an Athlon than CuMine optimized code does on a CuMine." "I don't know any of either. Maybe JC could help us out." This is pretty easy. Take comparable P-III-866: spec.org and compare it with K7-850: spec.org V--run time ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 145.fpppp 9600 193 49.8 9600 193 49.8 - P-iii-866 145.fpppp 9600 96.7 99.3 9600 -- -- - K7-850 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 199.5% The difference in remaining benchmarks is solely due to differences in FSB+memory latencies, plus some known K7 cache disadvantages. Regards, - Ali