SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (8652)7/17/2000 7:55:49 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 9127
 
But my dear- I did not call him a liar AND I mentioned this post in my chronology. I will find the URL for you dear. I am sorry you failed again. Perhaps one day. And what happened to ignore Dear? Was it just impossible for you to resist me?

To: Michael D. Cummings who wrote
(8614)
From: X the Unknown
Sunday, July 16, 2000 11:49 PM ET
Reply # of 8657

>Personally, my response to Vince would go something like this... I don't doubt you
heard what you heard on the radio, but I would have to see more evidence to believe it
actually happened. <

How about "I don't doubt you believe you heard what you think you heard on the
radio..."

Poor Michael. As I am on "ignore" you will not see my wise words, or will you? But I
said essentially what you said. I agreed there was all kinds of crap on the radio- but I
said I couldn't believe it without some other verification. Vince- then- decided to use
the word liar. A word I have not and did not use. But since you are not following the
conversation- since you couldn't be reading my posts- HOW would you know what
the responses to Vince were??? I mean they were mostly MINE. Or ARE you reading
them??? And merely saying you aren't? Heeheehee. Well I know what I think you're
doing. I'm sure you don't believe you are reading my posts.

This was after, here are the FIRST posts dear:

To: Master who wrote (8435)
From: X the Unknown
Wednesday, July 12, 2000 7:13 PM ET
Reply # of 8657

No freaking way do I accept that. A radio broadcast? I hear all sorts of crap on the
radio- I've heard all sorts of malarky about aliens on the radio. If you didn't see it in
print and don't know the details (or at least SOME details) don't talk about it as if it
were fact.

To: Master who wrote (8431)
From: X the Unknown
Wednesday, July 12, 2000 7:11 PM ET
Reply # of 8657

Elementary schools?

I've read about fights when they tried to install them in High Schools. Find me a
reputable news story about anyone installing them in elementary schools.

uh huh -

To: X the Unknown who wrote (8428)
From: Master
Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:34 PM ET
Reply # of 8657

X, Please!!!

That was one of those stories you'll find on the tail end of a radio news broadcast. I
don't recall the time or the place but the next time I come across something similar I'll
make it a point to send you a copy.

Michael C would be the first to accept THIS kind of source for a LIBERAL newsstory- I am SURE of that...NOT

To: Rambi who wrote (8422)
From: Master
Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:25 PM ET
Reply # of 8657

Rambi,

Undoubdtedly you've heard of some elementary schools installing condom distributors
in washrooms. Like I said previously, kids should be left to enjoy their childhood. Let
them skip rope, play tag, hide-n-seek, dolls, cars, etc. Exposing them to sex at that age
is IMO cheating them of their youth. And one does not have to be religious to share
this sentiment.

Vince

To: Master who wrote (8426)
From: X the Unknown
Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:14 PM ET
Reply # of 8657

I don't think so. WHERE were these publicized? Not in...the mainstream press.
Because I read a lot, and I've never read anything like this. Ever. Please produce
proof- a url for example.

To: Master who wrote (8410)
From: X the Unknown
Wednesday, July 12, 2000 4:08 PM ET
Reply # of 8657

I find it difficult to believe that is taught with district approval. In fact I find that
impossible to believe. That would be occasion for disciplinary action in our district. I
cannot believe your "friends" daughter was taught this with the approval of the district.

I even find it almost impossible to believe you had a rogue teacher doing something so
inappropriate.

I really don't know why you feel this is a major fight for you. But go ahead- tell me again you'll sit on my face. Defend the guy who called me vaginal bacteria- that really defines who you are my dear.



To: greenspirit who wrote (8652)7/17/2000 8:11:38 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 9127
 
To: Steven Rogers who wrote (8604)
From: Michael D. Cummings
Sunday, July 16, 2000 11:40 PM ET
Reply # of 8657


>In the article you sight, (which I had to go out of my way to look up since X is on
ignore) the opening paragraph states the following:<

Are you a teller of the tall tales too? Not that I'd call you a LIAR....but well, tall tales, that's something else. Some people actually believe their own tall tales- I don't consider those people liars- I consider them self deceived. That is what I think Master might be and what I have always thought of you.

smooch



To: greenspirit who wrote (8652)7/17/2000 8:52:10 PM
From: Master (Hijacked)  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9127
 
Thank you Michael. If I remember correctly she said she is a lawyer. Somehow I sense that she was on Clinton's legal advisory team. When he got caught with his pants down (so-to speak) she probably suggested his line of defense..."Your Honor, a BJ is not sex"