SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ericsson overlook? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (4183)7/19/2000 5:08:24 AM
From: Mika Kukkanen  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 5390
 
"Good for Siemens"? For those wanting to know why Elmatador said good for Siemens in his last post, the reason is that Siemens (along with Alcatel) developed a competing wideband CDMA specification for ULTRA/UMTS standard in the ETSI approval process a 2 1/2 years ago. Siemens version was for TD-WCDMA. It was approved on the understanding it could be used for pico cells (indoors and high density situations, e.g., town centres). The Chinese wideband CDMA development is fairly similar.

For those who don't remember, ITU's IMT-2000 had several 'layers' and goals. These depended on a particular situation, i.e., pedestrian (including ETSI's DECT - a faster version), wide area mobile network (this is where the cdma2000 vs WCDMA war is) and satellite. Minimum requirements were set on bit rates for each of these sectors.

Footie season only a month or so away! Can't wait.

Elmatador - Maybe we take bets on when Siemens get their first 3G contract? Will they have to rely on Telekom, or has the Mannesmann take-over shaken up the German business thinking?