Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abbigail who wrote (47978)	7/18/2000 5:38:53 PM
From: JC Jaros	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

No no no. When MSFT says "research and development" they actually mean "legal fees". <g> --- We'll see how feeble this analysis is in the coming days. --- BTW, SUNW reports on Thursday should you want to do your own comparative analysis between today's earnings report from MSFT versus textbook solid earnings from a HEALTHY company; the kind that lead markets. (IMO) -JCJ

To: abbigail who wrote (47978)	7/18/2000 10:00:17 PM
From: PMS Witch	Respond to of 74651

These boys do offer SOME entertainment, no? To be honest, they do. It's seem that the 'classic' TMs provided some fresh debating points as time went by. These guys sing the same tune repeatedly. If one assumes the role of Thread Moron, they assume a duty to be a moron as well as be on the thread. Although I didn't agree with many of the points raised by the earlier TMs, I was profoundly impressed by their ability to dig up, and post links to, almost every negative opinion expressed on-line. They were like search engines permanently instructed to detect crap. Likewise, I was amazed at their stamina: How they maintained their energy and motivation was beyond me. At least Microsoft shareholders had profitable portfolios to keep them focused. These guys just lose, and lose more. Cheers, PW. (ACB<$1)