Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsheet who wrote (56435)	7/18/2000 7:58:40 PM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116820

pan am did not hit a new low in toronto, and closed up actually on a puny 300 shares near the end, but it traded as low as a fin (52 week low = 4.90 here) why would the central fund be at a low ? i thought all they did was own physical and that is not at a 52 week low...

To: goldsheet who wrote (56435)	7/18/2000 8:17:18 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Respond to of 116820

in the case of TVX there's also the pending final approval of the project in Greece - all indications are that the permit needed to begin mining will be granted. that would almost double TVX's output, and lower its overall production costs considerably if the estimates are to be believed. actually most of the mid tier producers will probably be taken over anyway...or perhaps one of them gets cute and begins to merge with other smaller producers to gain some critical mass. but a shake-up is inevitable imo.