SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EMC How high can it go? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (10659)7/19/2000 2:06:10 PM
From: Lynn  Respond to of 17183
 
Dear Tony and thread: Here's what ML wrote on EMC in their, "Tech Bits & Bytes," this morning then basically repeated in their, "Intra-Day Special Note: EMC, INCY, HSP, SBSA:"

EMC Corp (EMC, $78 9/16, B-1-1-9) New Product Cycle Drives Big Upside (Steve Milunovich 212-449-2047)
• Revenue increased 30% to $2.15bil compared with our 24% forecast while EPS was $0.19 versus our $0.17 forecast. The new
Symmetrix 8000 shipped in volume, generating $500mm of sales. Overall storage growth was 43%, including a 96% gain in software
and an improvement to 30% growth for CLARiiON.
• We think his report should put to rest any near-term concerns about competition hurting EMC. HP is just now back to last year’s
storage run rate, Sun is playing catch-up, and IBM Shark features may be further delayed. Storage is hot, and EMC is the market
leader. Our price objective is $100 per share.

[end of ML quote]

Regards,

Lynn, *hopefully* over the 6 weeks of phone lines/modem problems

P.S. I just saw that geek comment. Consider it a compliment, Tony!



To: Tony Viola who wrote (10659)7/19/2000 3:07:09 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17183
 
Dear Tony: Yeah, I saw that but I thought they said you were not a geek cause you were into hardware not software? Then someone said you may be a hardware geek??
As to the calculation, guess what, I am NOW convinced that they are going to EXCEED 12 Billion in 2001. Why? Cause any number I use to reach 12 B has to be less then their indicated actual growth rate. Wonder if the Analysts will figure this out? JDN