Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (120643)	7/20/2000 3:28:35 AM
From: coachbobknight	Respond to of 1573124

i have been successful communicating with faber on squawk in the past by using this method... the producers read the emails and then pass them to the appropriate on air person... i sent to kernan, faber and bambi francisco of cbs marketwatch... we need the numbers to be corrected... squawk@cnbc.com

To: Petz who wrote (120643)	7/20/2000 9:59:39 AM
From: f.simons	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 1573124

>>"Didn't Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) actually beat estimates for its second quarter by $1.51 vs.$1.14 consensus?"<< How do you figure? Adding in taxes paid? I have posted here several times about adding in Intel taxes back when AMD was paying none. Seemed to me it made any comparisons fairer. NEVER ONCE did anyone agree with me. So if you want to add AMD's taxes back in, let's do it for Intel as well, and throw in Intel's costs of acquisitions while we're at it. AMD is now part of the real world, where real profits are made and taxes are paid. Be happy about that. You only have to endure one quarter of pain, because next quarter earnings will be compared to 1.21 and not 1.51 Frank