SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa and Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (404)7/20/2000 4:03:44 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff  Respond to of 10065
 
** Greenspan and NAIRU **

Greenspan-don't think jobless rate has to rise


WASHINGTON, July 20 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said on Thursday he did not think the U.S. unemployment rate, currently near a three-decade low, needs to move higher in order to prevent a rise in inflation.

"I think the evidence indicating that the need to raise the unemployment rate to stabilize prices is unpersuasive, in my judgment," Greenspan told the Senate Banking Committee.

The U.S. unemployment rate now stands at 4 percent.

During his semi-annual monetary testimony to Congress, Greenspan said he had doubts about the validity of a long-held economic theory that there is a particular level of unemployment below which inflation will start to flare up.

Greenspan noted there was very heated debate within the economic profession about the so-called non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment, or NAIRU, viewed as the level below which inflationary dangers would build.

"My forecast is that the NAIRU, which served as a very useful statistical procedure to evaluate how the economy was behaving over a number of years like so many types of temporary models which worked, is probably going to fail in the years ahead," he said.

Although he emphasized he suspected that the jobless rate at 4 percent would not lead to inflation, the Fed chief noted that it was still an open question within the economic field.

12:13 07-20-00



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (404)7/20/2000 6:47:23 PM
From: MrGreenJeans  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10065
 
Justa

How do you like to see the economy tied to the clowns at OPEC to such a large degree? Now that is what I call "risk."

The "clowns" at OPEC may have played a role in slowing consumer spending in this country limiting any further rate increases for this year. Further, the price of oil is not as significant a measure in the price indexes as most believe.