SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (473)7/20/2000 7:32:39 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 12465
 
IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SUE TITAN AND THE KEERY CLAN

I have the case all layed out if anyone gets a attorney. Nobody knows more than I do about what is going on with TMOT.

In the 2themart.com scam the attorneys used my research as their guideline to sue them for millions. Maybe this example will help you out.

The Incredible $640 Million 2TheMart Web Site
Released May 25, 1999
thetruthseeker.com

"TMRT: 2 The Mart With No Money" the ongoing saga.
Released August 25, 1999
thetruthseeker.com

May I suggest a very good attorney while I am here to help you all. Michael D. Braun of
STULL, STULL & BRODY will be able to pick the meat off there bones.

TMRT Class Action, Truthseeker Hopes Rebeil and Magliarditi Don't Represent Themselves
thetruthseeker.com

Michael D. Braun (167416)
STULL, STULL & BRODY
10940 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 2300
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Telephone: (310) 209-2468

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (473)7/20/2000 7:35:01 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 12465
 
RE: TITAN MOTORCYCLE;"(iii) the Company is in the process of reducing its workforce by approximately 25% in an effort to lower expenses, and (iv) distributorships owned by the Keery family, which controls Titan Motorcycles, are in the process of being sold or shut down."
TITAN MOTORCYCLE CO OF AMERICA INC filed this 8-K on 07/20/2000.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) July 14, 2000

Titan Motorcycle Co. of America

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Nevada 000-24477 86-0776876
------ --------- ----------
(State or Other Jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer
of Incorporation) File Number) Identification No.)

2222 West Peoria Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85029

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (602) 861-6977

-----------------------------

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Titan Motorcycle Co. of America (the "Company") announced today that it

has signed a modification and extension through September 11, 2000 to its loan

agreement with Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. A copy of the modification and

extension is included as Exhibit 10.1 to this filing. The extension was granted

in light of Titan's inability to date to secure a new credit facility to replace

the existing line of credit. In this regard, discussions with two potential new

lenders that had expressed a preliminary interest in replacing and expanding the

existing facility have terminated, and the Company is in the process of seeking

additional capital and a new lender. Among other things, the modification and

extension with Wells Fargo (1) further limits the Company's borrowing capacity,

and (2) requires that the Company develop and implement profit improvement and

asset reduction plans and engage an investment banker to explore the Company's

strategic alternatives. If the Company is unable to replace the Wells Fargo line

with a new credit facility, it will be forced to sell or wind down its business.

In addition, the loan agreement contains various continuing obligations, including financial covenants. If the Company fails to satisfy these covenants, it would go into default which could accelerate any decision to liquidate or file for reorganization.

The Company also announced that: (i) it is receiving increasing pressure for additional payments from trade creditors, and is encountering difficulties in obtaining necessary parts from these suppliers to manufacture its motorcycles; (ii) Deutsch Financial Service and Transamerica Commercial Finance Corporation, which provide "floor financing" to the Company's dealers, have notified the Company that they intend to terminate (in Transamerica's case) or may terminate (in Deutsch's case) these arrangements unless dealer payments are guaranteed or other accommodations are made; (iii) the Company is in the process of reducing its workforce by approximately 25% in an effort to lower expenses, and (iv) distributorships owned by the Keery family, which controls Titan Motorcycles, are in the process of being sold or shut down. These stores have historically accounted for a significant portion of the Company's sales and currently owe the Company approximately $600,000, the collection of which is uncertain. The inventory held by these dealerships will be returned to the Company through Transamerica, with a corresponding payment due Transamerica in the amount of $1.3 million. The Company does not have the cash to make this payment, and has reached a verbal agreement with Transamerica that would allow it to resell the returned inventory to dealers and repay Transamerica over a three month period.

In light of the foregoing, the Company is actively reviewing a number of possible strategic alternatives, including: (A) seeking alternative sources of capital or debt financing; (B) negotiating to maintain the Transamerica and Deutsch facilities in place; (C) implementing a further reduction in its workforce and an overall reduction in its operations; and (D) selling or merging the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to implement any of these strategies. If the Company is not successful in achieving one or more of these strategic alternatives, it may be forced to liquidate or file for reorganization under the federal bankruptcy laws.

NASDAQ LISTING

The Company also announced that it was notified by Nasdaq that it was not in compliance with Nasdaq's continuing SmallCap Market criteria. Specifically, Nasdaq noted that the Company did not have either $2 million in net tangible assets, $35 million of market capitalization or $5 million in net income. Subsequent to Nasdaq's notification, the Company's preferred stockholders agreed to modify the terms of their preferred stock so that it would be characterized under generally accepted accounting principles as capital, rather than as mezzanine instruments.

-2-

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon filing of appropriate amendments to the terms and conditions of the Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company believes that its net tangible assets (assuming it is a going concern) will exceed the minimum Nasdaq requirement of $2 million and has so notified Nasdaq. Nasdaq also inquired into the reasons for the Company's auditors rendering a going concern opinion in connection with the Company's 1999 financial statements, which (together with the opinion) were filed in its Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 1999. The Company advised Nasdaq that the going concern opinion issued by its auditors arose principally out of the fact that its primary financing source, its line of credit with Wells Fargo Business Credit, was to come due on April 10, 2000, and at year-end the Company did not have another facility available to refinance this debt. Coupled with Company's losses from operations, the auditors determined that a going concern opinion was appropriate. The Company has received extensions on the Wells Fargo facility, the most recent one of which is described above and included herein. In light of the Company's current situation, it is unsure whether the Nasdaq will take action to delist the Company's securities and, if so, what the timing of such an action would be.

If the Company fails to maintain Nasdaq SmallCap Market listing for its securities, trading in its stock is likely to be materially adversely effected. Among other things, the Company's common stock would then constitute "penny stock," which would place increased regulatory burden upon brokers, making them less likely to make a market in the stock.

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

(c) Exhibits.

EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------ -----------
10.1 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement
dated as of July 10, 2000 with Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc.
(executed July 14, 2000)

10.2 Proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation for Series A
Preferred Stock

10.3 Proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation for Series B
Preferred Stock

-3-

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Titan Motorcycle Co. of America

/s:/Francis S. Keery/ --------------------- Francis S. Keery Chief Executive Officer

Dated: July 17, 2000

-4-

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ------ -----------

10.1 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of July 10, 2000 with Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. (executed July 14, 2000)

10.2 Proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock

10.3 Proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation for Series B Preferred Stock



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (473)7/20/2000 10:03:48 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 
TheTruthseeker Report-The Strange Case of the TMOT S3

On July 20, 2000, shortly after anouncing, in an 8K, that the company
was on the brink of total collapse, Titan Motorcycle then released an
S3. An S3 is a registration statement allowing a company or its large
investors to sell shares. Many investors, however, know to be careful of
S3 filings, because the money raised doesn't go to the company! Thats
right. TMOT will get no money from this offering. So don't be fooled
into thinking that this share sale might help the company out of its
mess. It won't.

Tbis filing is allowing the investors, who only one month ago, on June
20 2000, bought the Series C Convertible Stock (and got lots of free
warrants too!), to convert it into common stock, and sell it on the open
market. Basically, this is a fire sale, they are trying to get out while
they still can.

If you look back to June 22 2000, you will find an 8K from TMOT which
describes the Series C Financing, here are some highlights:
_______________________________
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

On June 20, 2000, Titan Motorcycle Co. of America sold 650 shares of
Titan's Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and a warrant to purchase
821,053 shares of Titan's common stock to Esquire Trade & Finance Inc.
and 650 shares of Titan's Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and a
warrant to purchase 821,053 shares of Titan's common stock to Celeste
Trust Reg. in a private placement for a total of $1,300,000 in gross
proceeds to Titan.

Unless shareholder approval is obtained, the Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock and warrants are convertible at any time into a maximum
of 1,750,000 shares of Titan's common stock for Esquire and 1,750,000
shares of Titan's common stock for Celeste.
_________________________________

So, what does this mean?

Lets use Esquire Trade and Finance (ETF) as an example.

On June 20, 2000, ETF gave TMOT $650,000 and in return got the
equivalent of 2,571,053 shares of common stock (1750000 + 821053). So
ETF paid 25 cents a share for TMOT stock. (2,571,053/650,000). Well, on
June 20th, the date of the transaction, the closing price for TMOT stock
was 1.0625. So the investors got a discount of about 77% to market.

Even today, after the news that, even with the June 20 private
placement, the company is basically BK, the investors still have about a
40 cent gain. Today's close was about 65 cents.

What do you think these investors will do? The Truthseeker guess is that
at any price above 25 cents, they make money, so logically they will
dump and dump and dump some more until the price goes back above .25!
Maybe they will even give some stock to paid promoters, in return for
pumping services. Who knows for sure? Only they do, but one thing is
certain, TMOT has blown a gasket.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (473)7/25/2000 1:55:54 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Respond to of 12465
 
Re: 7/19/00 - Cybersmear Defendant Reportedly Fights Back With Rule 11 Sanctions Motion

July 19, 2000

Cybersmear Defendant Reportedly Fights Back With Rule 11 Sanctions Motion

Eric Turkewitz, an attorney representing Defendant Francis Worst in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York that included cybersmear claims against various defendants reports on a rather unique circumstance that has arisen in that proceeding. The lawsuit involved is Sovereign Partners Limited Partnership, Dominion Capital Fund Ltd. and Stephen M. Hicks v. Restaurant Teams International, Inc., ConSyGen, Inc., Stanley Swanson, Curtis Swanson, Thomas Dreaper, Francis Worst, et al. (S.D.N.Y., proposed amended complaint filed on Sept. 28, 1999). According to Mr. Turkewitz, it seems that after other defendants in the suit settled the claims against them, Defendant Worst refused settlement overtures and moved for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mr. Worst reportedly seeks US$300,000 in sanctions against the plaintiffs and their counsel in the case.

cybersecuritieslaw.com

[Issue 1, Volume 33]

=====

Rule 11

...

(b) Representations to Court.

By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,--

(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;

(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law;

(3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.

...

www2.law.cornell.edu[jump!3A!27rule11!27]/doc/{@126}?