Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (56607)	7/29/2000 12:19:04 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 117026

Enigma, You been quiet on this thread, causing it to wandered off course. Not good if you only show up when Ken or I bash Barrick. But if thats what it takes, then I will reluctantly relinquish what little common sense I hold and do what a gata nut gotta do. Its now an hour since I did the following, "Coop of World Gold Council = all Chickens + one Fox (Barrick)" and still no retaliation reply from you, which now causes I to up the idiot level of my already babble posts, and try again to once again most likely not be successful, atleast in the eyes on non gata nuts, and most gold bugs, to prove you wrong in the following. <<...huff and puff, you won't blow this [Barrick]house down.>> ok, taken to an extreme speculation statement, beyond a rumor towards a lie, I present a question with multiple choice answers. answers to a false question do not exist but you may supply any or not as it does not change "first impressions" Possibility that Barrick has already allocated resources discreetly and/or secretly in time + money + personnal for the Gold Anti Trust Litigation (GATL) event which will be seened as a follow through, correctly so or not, to the Gold Anti Trust Action (GATA) activity ??? 1. True 2. False 3. Insufficant information available to know if true or not. 4. "Not if, but when." 5. To know requires a "Need to Know", which I know I no have. 6. To hypothesize on an hypothetical is folly. 7. No facts supplied with question, so no answer possible. 8. Garbage Post/Question/Statement 9. other howling against a wall doug