SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: semiconeng who wrote (120683)7/22/2000 1:55:18 AM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 1572631
 
SemiconEng, <NOBODY was beating a path to his door for the original Dolby Noise Reduction technology..... in the beginning.....My how times have changed.....>

There is a "little" difference. The Dolby technology
is based on solid physical principles. The Rambus
"technology" ignores them.



To: semiconeng who wrote (120683)7/22/2000 6:12:07 AM
From: Anthony Corbett  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572631
 
Heh SemiCon

I thought the main man was Ray Dolby. Who's Thomas?



To: semiconeng who wrote (120683)7/23/2000 10:42:25 AM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 1572631
 
semi,

NOBODY was beating a path to his door for the original Dolby Noise Reduction technology

Dolby's beginnings were rather different than Rambus'. Rambus got Intel locked into a very complex legal and financial relationship, long before DRDRAM technology was proven. This is a credit to the legal department at Rambus, and makes one question the leadership at Intel.

Since then, the Rambus technology has largely failed. Most benchmarks show no performance gain at a significant price premium. Instead of developing a useful technology, Rambus has gone a different direction. Those same brilliant Rambus lawyers have figured out how to extract money from other people's products. In the animal kingdom, this is known as being a parasite.

I think it is very unfair to Dolby to compare them with Rambus.

Scumbria