Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : STLW -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (20)	7/21/2000 4:55:44 PM
From: Andrew N. Cothran	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 75

You are right and I agree with your conclusion.

To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (20)	7/21/2000 11:14:41 PM
From: Red Dragon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 75

They say the "could" spin off STLW, not they WILL, BIG difference Is it possible that it's just "lawyer" language? Everyone seems to think it's all but a done deal. There's even a Merrill Lynch write-up, as you may have seen. messages.yahoo.com The McGinley family (Chairman) apparently owns a huge voting portion of METHA, and they would obviously profit very handsomely if the spinoff occurs. I can't imagine why they wouldn't want it to happen. Here's the link to the propectus. The language seems very clear that it is METHA's intention to spin off STLW. I think some of the cautious comments are just lawyerly hedging. sec.gov