SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DanZ who wrote (7261)7/23/2000 10:56:21 AM
From: Dale Baker  Respond to of 10293
 
Please drop by and let us know if your predictions came true, or the events even happened at all.

From what I heard from Bill before he vanished, his stockpicking problems were on the long side, shifting from growth to value and back again at the wrong times. But that's just speculation.

The post about his picks concerned the fact that none had taken off explosively and held their gains since they were raised here.

I don't have the energy or interest to go back through this thread and the GUMM thread and see how many erroneous price predictions there were for GUMM's big long ascent. I have had a pretty good year without paying much attention to GUMM at all.

Good luck.



To: DanZ who wrote (7261)7/23/2000 12:14:02 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Respond to of 10293
 
But what's the point?

That much, I agree with. If you're so desperate to feel "right" that you're willing to cast anyone who disagrees as "unreasonable" and "hateful", there is nothing further for us to discuss.



To: DanZ who wrote (7261)6/16/2009 5:15:02 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik1 Recommendation  Respond to of 10293
 
"Never" is a very, very long time.

Last, I predict that GUMM will never reach Wexler's target of $5 (~$50 million market cap).