SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jim kelley who wrote (47684)7/24/2000 3:59:17 AM
From: Eric K.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
jim-- Re: You have been so wrong in your judgments.

Could you cite a specific example? You could, for example, summarize some statement I have made in the past about RDRAM or RAMBUS, and then refute that statement. The posters on this thread never cease to amaze me with new lows in intelligence. This is, by far, the least analytical and most irrational investing thread I have ever read.

Re: It is a broken record that you are playing.

I have never before made a statement about Richard Belgard's three hours of archival patent work before; I have no idea what you are talking about.

Re: No one really takes you seriously anymore.

You and "tricky" dicky are the same guys that could not see the sarcasm in Bilow's post about being paid by some sinister corporation on a thread called "Bashers Only" and who regularly cite Yahoo posts as credible sources of information.

The rise in RMBS has absolutely nothing to do with anything you talked about prior to about four months ago, and your continuing tripe about RDRAM gaining non-trivial market share remains, at best, in the future. Just a hint here, we're more than half way through 2000, do you think Dataquest's projections on rambo's market share for this year will have to be revised down for the nth time?

I'm not going to bother asserting that RDRAM is moribund, but nobody who qualifies for membership in Homo Sapiens would assert that RDRAM has fulfilled its expectations to date. If you want to take the line that prices will trickle downward and RDRAM will end up winning in 2001, you can, but your assertions about us being wrong on RDRAM so far are utterly laughable and completely egregious.

-Eric



To: jim kelley who wrote (47684)7/24/2000 9:30:10 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Jim,

You're right. DRDRAM has really taken off, and DDR is dead. Also, the performance of DRDRAM has been proven to live up to it's supporters claims.

Scumbria