SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lee who wrote (47730)7/24/2000 2:57:22 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Steve,

SO if RDRAM is too costly and you want to build this system with the equivalent memory bandwidth of 32 RDRAM channels, what architecture would you use?

It is not just a matter of the RDRAM being too costly. Everything in the system is too costly. The graphics engine which uses 32 DRAM channels of any type will be prohibitively expensive to manufacture. Throw in the high cost of DRDRAM, and the problem is massively compounded.

Been there, done that!

Scumbria



To: Steve Lee who wrote (47730)7/24/2000 3:57:09 PM
From: Mihaela  Respond to of 93625
 
I am thinking Intel will take some ~1.5B profits from the sale of MU stock and get RDRAM ramped at Samsung, Toshiba or some of the other big memory manuf. co. for the Pentium 4.