Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (2112)	7/24/2000 7:16:24 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 275872

JC still working on his transcriptish for the CC. Looks like AMD did hammer the facts of 1.21 vs 1.51 jc-news.com steve Thanks JC!

To: AK2004 who wrote (2112)	7/24/2000 7:20:44 PM
From: Goutam	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Albert, < a)bribe b)conflict of interest c)anti-competative practice <=> monopoly at worst d)manipulation of the stock market e)all of the above And since Intel claim Cap Gains as recurring item then should not it be considered a financial institution and follow sec regulations?> All questions aside, how did RAMBUS get hold of Intel by the tail? I bet Intel thought it's the easiest way(by having the control of memory standard) to annihilate the competition instead of the good old fashioned way by producing impeccable products. Goutama