Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (67043)	7/24/2000 8:57:01 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Um, this isn't the guy who told you pheasants and chickens can make chickants and pheasens is it? Oh, gosh, oh, geeze, I've told about 50 people this is a fact.

To: Ish who wrote (67043)	7/24/2000 10:59:41 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

DING! DING! DING! Time for a clinton SANITY CHECK - Ignore the nasty little woman behind the curtain: Slur or not, Hillary's still scurrilous There's no way that a couple who decried the 1980s as the ``decade of greed'' could be among the grubbiest of money-grubbing materialists - using political clout to pursue personal gain in a shady real-estate deal and reaping suspicious profits from a commodities investment. . . . It's impossible that a crusader for children's welfare - who served as chairman of the Children's Defense Fund and wrote a book titled ``It Takes a Village'' - could have interrupted the filming of an ad featuring underprivileged, preschool children on the grounds of the Arkansas governor's mansion growling, ``I want to get this s--t over with and these damn people out of here'' (as related to David Brock by Arkansas trooper Roger Perry). It is not to be believed that a member of the Clintons' political family, a vice president renowned for his empathy for the underdog, would allow his dirt-poor tenants to live in a roach palace. It's inconceivable that a president who publicly feels the pain of women would privately cause so much pain to individual women; that a man who signed an expansion of the federal sexual harassment law earlier would have dropped his trousers before a woman he'd just met and asked her to ``kiss it''; or that a politician who's publicly committed to women's rights would perjure himself to deny one woman's right to justice. And a lady who's a feminist icon, who knew that her husband was a compulsive fornicator, couldn't possibly have spent the past seven years defending him against accusations of being himself, dismissing his victims as stalkers and attacking his accusers as tools of a vast conspiracy. Such things are beyond the realm of imagining. Rhetoric trumps reality and advocacy negates actions. By their public pronouncements you shall know them. Their deeds are a needless distraction from the splendor of their agenda. Ignore the nasty little woman behind the curtain,frantically pulling the levers. She is the great, compassionate and exceedingly tolerant Oz. bostonherald.com