Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas Mercer-Hursh who wrote (28681)	7/25/2000 1:12:37 AM
From: mauser96	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54805

Perhaps you should actually read a post before you rush to make un gentlemanly comments like "blatent untrue" I said that the new digital cameras costing $800 or $900 are as good as regular 35 mm film cameras in the print sizes that non-pros want. These sizes are seldom much larger than 3X4 and the cheap cameras used don't have world class optics.These non pros aren't examining their prints with a magnifying glass, they are looking at it at normal distances. The average non pro consumer doesn't use a Nikon SLR, he uses a cheap point and shoot. Many people who have actually looked at images from top of the line digital cameras agree with me, in many cases saying even 4X5 or larger looked as good. I know that this is an apples oranges thing, but I pointed out in the post that the inflection point is in the future. Digital cameras will improve faster than film cameras. Sndisk is far past the shinny pebble stage though the future is never set. I would really be amazed if anachonistic fragile rotating magnetic media represented the future. Get real.