Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Shread who wrote (25923)	7/25/2000 9:36:22 AM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

Paul, I am aware of 2 probability studies, one in fluid dynamics and the other in genetics. The one in genetics was really interesting. My friend, who is on the advisory board of one of the genomics firm, was trying to determine the probability in mapping the human genome. His first results came in extremely high, over 90% and he knew there was no chance that he could be correct. He noticed that he used the normal set which limits the variables, so he then opened it up to all the variables(open set not closed set). He ran the probability program over and over and came with similar results around 63%. Similar results from the fluid dynamics study. Well 63% is so close to the FIBONACCI number of 61.8%, and we believe there is a relation. Thats how I got the 62%, just lazy to write 61.8%. ggggg seeya