SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (84089)7/25/2000 5:24:17 PM
From: Father Terrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
We could always open our borders and airlift them all here... say to Roanoke, Virginia?

(BTW, it is "dying," not dieing.)

FT



To: one_less who wrote (84089)7/25/2000 6:51:05 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
It is the specific, planned, and authorized agenda of the Clinton/Albright policy.

I think you'll find that support for that policy is quite bipartisan. Don't expect it to change if Bush gets in. Nor is it anything new, just an extension of the old "we had to destroy the village in order to save it" attitude.

Is there any real difference between the sanctions imposed on Iraq and those imposed on Cuba?

If they had their druthers they'd just as soon gas the little buggers.

If it wasn't for the US and UN presence they would have their druthers, and they would gas the little buggers.

The bottom line is these kids would not be dieing by the hundreds of thousands if we were not doing what we are doing.

Not necessarily true. If Iraq were allowed to export oil and other products the government would have more money, but there is no assurance that any of this money would trickle down to or be spent on the villagers in question. And if US aircraft weren't enforcing no-fly zones over portions of Iraq, a lot of those kids would have been blown up by the Iraqi air force before they had a chance to starve.

It is not such a simple issue.



To: one_less who wrote (84089)7/25/2000 6:51:22 PM
From: James R. Barrett  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
"This is all well known and the White House makes no apologies for it. The bottom line is these kids would not be dying by the hundreds of thousands if we were not doing what we are doing. It is our deliberate intended actions that are causing these deaths."

Who gives a shit? You should be worrying about the price of gas and not about a bunch of crib lizards. Relax, pop a can of Bud. They aren't your kids. Call it an act of God.