SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (84091)7/25/2000 5:41:16 PM
From: CharleyMike  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
....Do to the US imposed sanctions....

It's also due instead of do. Unless you're indicating the first half of the pejorative for fecal mater.

I find it hard to believe that the US has directly targeted children. I refuse to believe that even of Clinton whom I dislike a considerable amount.

We cannot save the world from all fools.

Those who try to be charitable,

those who try to make a difference in the richness of other's lives,

those who care ~

are those who receive the most criticism from those who only complain.



To: one_less who wrote (84091)7/25/2000 6:23:28 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Brees, let me preface this by saying a lot of attacks on Iraq have been to cover for a high ranking White House Official.

<<Why? They are perfectly able to live and care for themselves if we stop imposing our selves on them?>>

OTOH if the sanctions were lifted, would the money go to the people or be spent on more armaments to kill Saddam's percieved enemies in Iraq?

Tough question. Saddam has to be taken out by Moslem people, a purely Christian effort would cause havoc. For the last 7 1/2 years we haven't had a leader who is trusted enough around the world to lead such an effort.



To: one_less who wrote (84091)7/25/2000 8:37:27 PM
From: Father Terrence  Respond to of 108807
 
If you want a leader that is totally morally bankrupt look to Saddam. Clinton is bad, but he's no Saddam.