SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (84114)7/25/2000 7:59:56 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
The problem with these figures is that the sanctions are not the only variable that can account for the difference. During and immediately after the Gulf war, many Iraqis that were opposed to Saddam came out of the closet, mistakenly believing that the US would push the campaign into Iraq and remove him. When the war ended, Saddam commenced a brutal crackdown in these areas. How do you differentiate between deaths caused by the sanctions and deaths caused by Saddam's repression?



To: one_less who wrote (84114)7/25/2000 8:14:32 PM
From: James R. Barrett  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Iraq has been living under sanctions for over seven years yet Iraqi couples are still having thousands of babies knowing full well that these children will not be adequately fed or receive minimal medical attention. Is getting laid and having babies more important to the Iraqis than being able to properly care for these babies? Did the United States put condoms on the sanction list? Or are the Iraqi people extremely selfish and don't give a dam about their children? Would YOU have a baby under those conditions?



To: one_less who wrote (84114)7/25/2000 8:14:44 PM
From: CharleyMike  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
OK, I was reading elsewhere while you found that.

Accepting for a moment that UNICEF is correct
Accepting for a moment that the sanctions are creating hardships
Accepting for a moment that they don't seem to be having much effect on Saddam.

You still haven't shown that it was the intent of the American government to create a child killing situation.



To: one_less who wrote (84114)7/25/2000 9:01:49 PM
From: Father Terrence  Respond to of 108807
 
I prefer U.N.C.L.E. myself.

United Network Command for Law and Enforcement

But where is THRUSH when you need them? All we get is Sodamm Insane...

FT



To: one_less who wrote (84114)7/26/2000 7:25:28 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Not only have trade sanctions prevented average Iraqis from feeding their children, the U.S. deliberately bombed sewage treatment plants around the country to poison the water supply with deadly bacteria. Credible estimates suggest that more than a million people, half of them children, have died of dysentery and other preventable diseases, as well as malnutrition and starvation, since the end of the war.