Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles R who wrote (120933)	7/26/2000 8:30:15 AM
From: f.simons	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573075

>>Bottom line, Frank. Bottom line.<< Chuck- So I can safely assume that you owned no AMD stock a year ago. Bottom lines are certainly important, but so are peace of mind and a good night's sleep and stock price. Intel has had good bottom lines for many, many years. AMD has had good ones for three quarters, any you act like they invented the concept of profits. We will never agree on criteria for investment decisions. Some posters here repeat ad nauseum that Intel's revenues YOY are up 88M. Paul has repeatedly debunked that figure, but the same posters come back with it again and again. 20 years of great profits, which are continuing, is important to Intel investors. It understandably means squat to an AMD investor. Only the last three quarters matter to you. You have no idea how funny it is to see Intel slammed as a has-been company, all washed up etc. and have the stock double every two years or so. Frank