Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (2306)	7/25/2000 9:05:31 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Scumbria, re: kicking Paul off Yup, Paul beat you to it. I failed to exercise my vote to keep him on, as i should have. I certainly did not see his posts as beyond the bounds. Clearly this thread is clearly imperfect in the way the kicking off was handled. Perhaps the rough and tumble of the old thwead was better. regards, Kash

To: Scumbria who wrote (2306)	7/25/2000 9:49:36 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Kash, Scumbria Yes Paul has been banned for two weeks. I promised to go by what the thread asks and that is what they did. Imperfect or not, that is the way it is. He was warned FOUR times. I personally voted against his ban but clearly the majority did not. If either of you think Paul is necessary to keep the contrarian perspective on this board, you are mistaken. Being respectful to all is not negotiable by most participant. IMO Paul clearly has not been respectful. You may disagree. Paul's contrarion views came at a price where most people did not want to pay. Mani