SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JayPC who wrote (24017)7/26/2000 8:00:59 PM
From: Solid  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29970
 
Hi Jay,

Crimmony, what a discount they give to Shaw. I was just up to PEI and the exchange rate was .43 on the dollar.

-Shaw pays his company approx $60 CDN per install
-T pays approx $180 USD per install.


So in US dollars Shaw pays them only $34.20 while T gets hosed for $180. Yikes. Somehow something does not appear to add up here. If this is the case and I were the company president, I'd be in America, EXCLUSIVELY, with all my crews raking in the big bucks. Not to be greedy, but to avoid being stupid.

Nicely done though, thank you very much for the information.



To: JayPC who wrote (24017)7/27/2000 12:07:28 AM
From: ahhaha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
Sorry to amend your note, but Att doesn't expend $180 per install. That guy is serving you up what he'd like to believe. I'm not at liberty to divulge what the actual average cost is, and I'm not sure how current my figure is, but it's substantially less, and it has gotten lower because the crews have gotten more efficient. Also, two man crews are no longer needed unless special circumstances arise. The area commander determines the tech per call based on the prevailing trend. You should tell him that an Att installer disagrees with his figure and ask him where he got that figure.