Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (2405)	7/26/2000 4:06:38 PM
From: Epinephrine	Respond to of 275872

Kash, (&thread) I saw the post calling for a vote on Paul's banning and abstained from voting at the time. However I think that several thread participants did not see the message. After Paul was banned news of that event was put in a modified original thread message. Next time we are in a position to hold a vote I propose that the notification of that pending vote be included in the original thread message at that time. That way no one would miss a lone call for votes in a flood of other posts but would have a set place to check on significant thread events (votings). There isn't a limit to how many modifications can be made is there? If not then if the bannings are to be listed there then I think the votes should be too as well as the results of those votes and also a list of who voted and which way. I agree wholeheartedly that the results of each vote by each person should be public to the thread. I think that the accused has a right to know his accusers. JMHO, Epinephrine