Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (24022)	7/26/2000 5:20:22 PM
From: Michaelth1	Respond to of 29970

OT, Ahhaha: I said that you panned ATHM between the 50s and the 90s. You first replied: <You're completely wrong about what I recommended. > then you say: <The fact is that I've recommended and panned this stock many times both publicly and privately after that top around 70 based on constructive things they did and destructive things they did. > That sounds like I was correct, in part (and therefore not completely wrong), in that you did pan the stock around 70, which is between the 50s and 90s. The fact of the matter is (and this very much flies in the face of your accusation that I'm a pump and dumper) that I rarely care about an individual's price predictions on a stock, particularly short term movements. I am much more interested in the events affecting the company, i.e., the business, since that will eventually tell the tale of the stock in the long run. Do I vaguely recall you oscelating back and forth on this stock? Yes, but I generally skip over non-business posts so all of the specifics elude me. Do I have any clue as to whether you were correct? Not really, except your last prediction have stuck in my head. Do I care? Only if it will help me in the future. <I wrote the book on this stock and know it better than any analyst or company officer.> That's impressive. If that's true, please give specific recomendations in the future, e.g., "buy" or "sell" at specific prices; not the vague "cash positive" or "under accumulation" or ... <So what does hand waiving about what you think I have done do for your empty claims?> It has absolutely nothing to do with my empty claims except that you were childish enough to call me a clown and other insults. I go by the rule of people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. <Am I the subject of this thread? > No, which is why I put OT on certain of my replies to you. You don't have the same courtesy.